Feeling stuck in life is rarely a motivation problem. According to Dr. Michael Bernard Beckwith, founder of Agape International Spiritual Center in Los Angeles and creator of the Life Visioning Process, it is almost always a stage problem. His framework describes four distinct developmental stages that explain why the same person can be thriving in one area of life and completely paralysed in another, and why the tools that work at one stage actively stop working at the next.

Why feeling stuck is a stage diagnosis, not a character flaw
What each of the four stages looks like in practice and how to recognise which one is active
Why forgiveness is not optional preparation for growth but the actual mechanism for leaving stage one
How purpose is accessed through a structured receptive practice rather than goal-setting or willpower
Why the same effort produces different results at different stages
What race consciousness is and why personal growth has a collective dimension

The most counter-intuitive idea in this framework

Most people who feel unfulfilled conclude they are not trying hard enough. Beckwith's framework suggests the opposite problem is more common: they are trying hard in entirely the wrong way for the stage they are actually at. Effort applied at the wrong stage does not produce results. It produces frustration. The framework does not ask you to try harder. It asks you to identify precisely where you are, because that determines which tools will actually move you.

What the four stages actually mean

The four stages are not a ladder you climb once and leave behind. They describe four different ways of relating to life, purpose, and personal power. A person can be in a completely different stage in their career than in their closest relationship, and in a different stage again in how they relate to money. Recognising this is not discouraging. It is precise. It tells you exactly where to focus.

Stage one is the stage in which life feels like something happening to you. The dominant experience is that external forces, other people, circumstances, your upbringing, the economy, control your outcomes. The characteristic behaviour is blame. When things go wrong, the cause is always outside. When things go right, something external gave it to you. This is not a moral failing. It is a level of awareness that everyone starts from, and that most people still operate from in at least some area of their life.

Stage two begins when you recognise that your inner world shapes your outer experience. Beliefs, perceptions, and mental patterns are not neutral observers of reality. They participate in creating it. This is the stage of visualisation, affirmation, and deliberate intention-setting. These tools are real. They work. Their limit is structural: you can only visualise what you can currently imagine, and what you can imagine is bounded by your existing mental models.

Stage three is where most frameworks stop and this one continues. Once the inner work of stage two is genuinely done, the practitioner stops trying to make things happen through personal willpower alone and begins to allow something larger to move through aligned action. The right resource, the right person, the right next step appear without the strain that characterised earlier effort. This is not magical thinking. It is what happens when internal resistance has been cleared and action is no longer fighting against itself.

Stage four is the most commonly misunderstood. The widespread assumption is that the highest stage of development involves peaceful withdrawal or doing less. The opposite is true. A person operating from stage four is available to contribute, create, and express at a level that is simply not accessible at earlier stages. More is required of them, not less.

Why unforgiveness is a stage one anchor

One of the most practically significant insights in this body of work concerns why stage one is so difficult to leave even when a person intellectually understands the framework. The answer is biochemical. Carrying resentment is not a passive emotional state. Every time a grievance-based thought is rehearsed, the body produces specific stress hormones. Those chemicals are mildly addictive. The thought triggers the memory, the memory triggers the emotion, the emotion triggers the chemistry, and the chemistry reinforces the thought. The loop perpetuates itself not through weakness but through a conditioned physiological cycle.

The forgiveness work described in the framework is not about condoning harm or restoring trust with the person who caused it. It is a structured internal practice for dissolving the energetic and biochemical hold of a past event on present perception. A five-stage process moves from willingness through active daily practice, perspective-taking, genuine well-wishing, and a final symbolic act. Each stage is repeatable. The reliable marker that the process is complete is specific: hearing the person's name or thinking of them produces no physical contraction and no surge of distress. The memory remains accessible but no longer carries the emotional voltage that was keeping the person anchored in stage one.

How purpose is actually accessed

Standard goal-setting starts with what the mind already wants and works backward to a plan. The Life Visioning Process, a structured seven-step practice developed by Beckwith over decades of teaching, begins from a different premise entirely. Within each person is a field of potential specific to their unique pattern. That potential may contain a direction for their life that exceeds anything their conditioned mind would generate on its own. The process opens receptivity to that signal rather than projecting existing desires onto the future.

The seven steps move through establishing an inner state of openness, asking specific empowering questions, identifying what must be developed to receive the emerging vision, identifying resources already present, naming what must be released, cultivating willingness, and entering a state of acceptance rather than petition. The sequence has a logic. The quality of what emerges depends entirely on the quality of inner state from which the questions are asked.

Vision does not always arrive during formal practice. It may come while falling asleep, during a walk, or in the middle of a routine task. The formal practice sets something in motion. The practitioner's role is to remain receptive and record what arrives. Over repeated sessions, the vision articulates itself more fully and begins to shape choices from within rather than from an externally imposed plan.

What is race consciousness and why does it matter?

One concept in this framework has no widely used equivalent in mainstream personal development. Race consciousness is the shared field of beliefs, fears, and habitual assumptions that a person absorbs from their cultural environment, peer group, and family system. It operates below the level of individual psychology. A person may have done significant personal work and still find themselves running collective patterns they did not choose and never examined.

This matters because it explains why isolation is not an effective growth strategy. The beliefs that keep a person in stage one are not purely individual. They are reinforced by every interaction with others who share them. Intentional community, structured practice alongside people committed to the same development, is not a social nicety. It is a functional accelerant. It provides language for experiences the individual cannot yet name, surfaces patterns that are invisible from inside them, and creates a field that supports rather than resists the growth being done.

The diagnostic tool: eight life structures

Progress in one area of life does not automatically transfer to all others. Eight distinct life structures serve as a diagnostic framework for identifying where energy is genuinely flowing and where it is being drained. The structures include the body, financial wellbeing, relationships, vocation, and several others. A structure is considered stable not when it has reached perfection but when it is contributing energy to a person's overall life rather than consuming it.

The empowering question framework can be applied to any single structure. When a specific area is consistently draining attention, the question is not "what is wrong here" but "what good is trying to happen in this area, and what must I become or release for it to move?" The question itself redirects attention from problem to emergence. That shift changes what follows.

Ask your own question

If something in this post has raised a question specific to your own situation, you can ask it directly on tryit.tv. The system draws on this source and others in the knowledge base to give you a personalised answer in seconds, without having to work through everything yourself.